DOWNLOAD FULL KUMPULAN SKRIPSI

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REGISTER, GENRE, AND IDEOLOGY OF EDITORIAL AND YOUR LETTERS COLUMN IN THE JAKARTA POST NEWSPAPER VIEWING CARTOON CONTROVERSY OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS)

This is a descriptive-qualitative research in nature employing comparative method aiming to describe and to compare the register, genre, and ideology of the texts on Editorial Column and Your Letters Column discussing the issue of The Prophet Muhammad cartoons controversy published in The Jakarta Post Newspaper on February 2006 and finally to discover the similarities and differences of both texts. The technique sampling used was total sampling for all aspects of lexicogrammar system, text structure and cohesion system considered as data. The source of data of the research were the texts taken from Editorial column Wednesday, February 8, 2006 and Your Letters column Saturday, February 18, 2006 of The Jakarta Post Newspaper. The data were two texts divided into one text from Editorial column and one text from Your Letters column issuing The Prophet Muhammad carton controversy. The data were further observed and analyzed by describing the lexicogrammar, interpreting register, genre, and ideology and were discussed to find out the writer’s ideology and to discover the similarities and differences of the data based on systemic Functional Linguistics. The interpretation of register covers three aspects, namely filed, tenor and mode. The interpretation of field shows that both texts have the same issue viewing the cartoons controversy of The Prophet Muhammad. In the tenor analysis involving status, affect, and contact, both texts have different characteristics. The status between the readers and the writer in the text I and the text II is unequal. The unequality status also occurs in the status between the writer and the inside participants in the text I. However, the status between the writer and the inside participants in the text II is equal. The affect of both texts illustrate that the writer tends to give negative judgment toward the inside participants and the appearing issue of the publication of the Prophet Muhammad cartoons. the contact shows that both texts have high readability and the language used is familiar. The analysis of mode concludes that both texts employ spoken- written channel. The style of spoken-written channel is appropriate for the medium that is Editorial Column and Your Letters Column of The Jakarta Post newspaper. Text I employs exposition genre. The Generic Structure Potential shows that the text comprises of Thesis – Argument I – Elaboration I – Event – Elaboration II – Argument II – Argument III – Recommendation I – Recommendation II – Argument IV – Restatement of Thesis. The text focuses on the international issue of the cartoon controversy of the Prophet Muhammad published by the Danish newspaper Jylland-Posten in September 2005. As well, Text II also employs exposition genre. The Generic Structure Potential shows that the text comprises of Thesis – Argument I – Argument II – Argument III – Argument IV – Argument V – Recommendation. The text concerns the way that should be done by both sides having debate in the cartoon controversy of the Prophet Muhammad. The writer’s ideology can be discovered through the employment of the register including field, tenor, mode, and genre. The occurrence of one point of view in both texts that rejects the issue of the cartoons controversy of The prophet Muhammad and the position of the writer having power to gain imply that both texts employ left antagonist ideology.
FULL DOWNLOAD